What David Locke Could Have Blogged
You can find the original David Locke blog here:
It all felt so normal. Everyone boarded the bus on time. We went through security and all the players were on the plane. I was the final person boarding the plane and Carlos Boozer was outside the plane's front door on the phone.
That is not totally unheard of, we aren't allowed to be on the phone on the plane so players will sometimes make a final call before a long flight. Then word spread that a player needed to get off the plane and all of us got a pit in our stomach.
You are a traveling party and anything that breaks that up feels very strange. The same way we all felt when Eric Maynor was moved in Miami. It is a tough day -- we all like Carlos a ton. He is wonderfully caring person who was once deemed to be the next Karl Malone. He has been a wonderful teammate and good friend for many of the guys.
However, this is really about basketball, and from a basketball standpoint it makes a lot of sense.
Miami called the Jazz about four months ago and wanted to make a deal with the Jazz for Carlos Boozer. On the first call the Heat offered the Jazz Udonis Haslem and Dorell Wright and Kevin O'Connor turned them down. The Heat countered with an offer of Haslem and Quentin Richardson for Kyle Korver and Boozer and again O'Connor told them it was a no deal.
Now on the deadline the Heat returned to the table offering the Jazz their first round pick with some protections. The Jazz felt that was a good enough asset that making the deal was worth being made.
Boozer was a restricted free agent at the end of the year and could have left the Jazz without any compensation if he got an offer that Jazz felt was more than they were able to match or wanted to match.
Now the Jazz with plenty of protection at the power forward position, with Paul Millsap, Andrei Kirilenko, and Mehmet Okur, have added a first round pick to their cache for the off-season.
Paul Millsap has shown he can be a starting power forward, and with AK, Okur, and Ronnie Brewer's games being much better when Boozer isn't using more than his fair share of possessions, the Jazz have plenty options depending on the match-ups.
On draft day the Jazz will have both the Knicks first round pick and the Miami Heat first round pick. This may allow O'Connor to couple the picks into a better position or to parlay that into some other piece of the puzzle.
Once before, O'Connor was able to work his magic on draft to get into the top 5 of the draft maybe this gives him the ability to do it again.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is EXACTLY what Locke would have blogged...
This is why I can’t stand 1320 anymore. Specifically Locke. He makes Keith Olbermann seem objective.
Given KOC’s history with players in the first round, this pick isn’t an asset. Unless the Jazz trade it again, which they would only do if they picked up the rights for a 15-year-old Euro or cash. Thanks Jazz front office! I love getting ousted in the 1st round of the playoffs every year.
Whitewater In The Morning
Actually who knows whose post was first
When I heard the Miami wants Boozer rumor, I kept checking back to see if anything played out.
Then news of Ronnie B. leaving for Memphis broke. I was and am kind of bummed. I liked Ronnie B. a lot—I like that he did exactly what Sloan wants from his young guys and ended up playing a major role on the team. But at the same time I understand the trade. It wasn’t a bad one. Just last week I argued the Jazz would be better off letting Ronnie and CJ go committing to KK and Wesley.
And then as detailed rumors of the Boozer-trade-that-wasn’t surfaced, I just didn’t get it. The Jazz traded Ronnie for a draft pick, but wouldn’t trade Boozer for a solid guy (Miami fans say Halsem’s the heart of the team) and/or more (and possibly multiple) draft picks.
Are they trying to build for the future or for this season? Pick one and stick with it. If you’re shooting for the moon right now, the trades need to shore up current team weaknesses (rebounding, interior defense). If you’re developing the future, identify who the future is (Millsap, Deron, AK), and make moves to develop and acquire new talents around them.
The Ronnie B. trade and keep-a-Boozer just don’t fit well in my opinion.
I got the crap beat out of me in Provo one time
if you are developing for the future
Why trade for Haslem? He wouldn’t bring more to the team this year than what Boozer will and is essentially just an expiring contract… the same thing that Boozer is, except the Jazz will have a better chance of going further in the playoffs this year if they keep Boozer on the team.
If on the other hand Miami did end up offering Beasley in exchange for Booze & someone like Korver, then I agree, that is a trade that they should have made for the future.
you're discounting the draft picks
Miami was offering Haslem + picks of some kind. You might be right, Haslem might make the team worse this year (maybe), but his expiring contract is cheaper and the picks would help compensate for the future.
Uh, do you think you could draw me like a ninja?
SLCDunk.com: Bringing you ninjas, The KOOFs and anti-jinxes since 2008.
if we'd traded for haslem, we wouldn't have been expecting him to take over for boozer
millsap would be taking over for boozer, and haslem would have been taking over for sap, which i think is acceptable given that millsap is our PF going forward and the problem wouldn’t have been who’s replacing boozer in the lineup, but who’s replacing millsap.
the draft picks would have been, as shums said, compensating for the future and could also have been pieces with which to future trades could have been made.
This is more a question about paying the luxury tax
Option 1: Trade boozer for future assets and a good backup for the future PF (millsap), AND GET UNDER THE LUXURY TAX=2nd round playoff exit
Option 2: trade brewer for 3 million dollars and a number 20 pick next year, STILL OVER LUXURY TAX. =2nd round playoff exit
As I see it either way the jazz arent making a championship run, so why not make a move that gets rid of jazz fan’s least favorite player, and get under the luxury tax..
Thats just my opinion, and I do see why the Jazz picked option 2 (to save the franchise money and still appear to be committed to winning) , but its a bit hypocritical to say you dont want to mess with team chemistry and then trade one of the most unselfish players on the team.

by 

























