Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The End Of Sabanball: Details, Barbarians, And Precision

Front Office Perspective: Try to Win or try to Save?

Ideally, if you are within striking distance of 2nd in your conference after the All-Star Break -- and your team has a solid core and expiring contracts -- the front office of said team will try to 'get over the hump'. Examples of this exist all through the history of the game. Houston traded away Otis Thorpe (among others) in order to get Clyde Drexler before the dead line -- they ended up rolling through the playoffs to claim their second championship in franchise history. The Detroit Pistons, in attempts to get better, traded Adrian Dantley for Mark Aguirre around the trade deadline. They went on to win back-to-back titles. Not all trades lead to titles -- but often they help tip the balance in the conference. Philly traded an old Toni Kukoc for Dikembe Mutombo (not exactly a spring chicken, himself) -- and all they did was get to the NBA Finals. Philly Had not gotten to the NBA Finals since the early 1980's. So this was an improvement for the 2001 squad.

Many factors influence the decision of a franchises' top brass to either go for broke, or play it safe. Money, Age, Talent and Experience are all important factors -- though the biggest factor that influences this decision is if the front office trusts and believes in the ability of their players. This trust goes both ways.

Instead of trying to improve, this entire season the Jazz brass have been trying to save money despite obvious signs of improvement all season long. (For those keeping score at home, the Jazz traded promising rookie PG Eric Maynor to the Thunder for nothing; and now traded 3 year starter Ronnie Brewer to the Vancouver Grizzlies (South) for the same -- Brewer was a lotto pick, and we're not getting one back in return. Maynor was a 1st rounder as well.) Instead of seeing reasons to trust this team, the Jazz brass decided to look in another direction. Not towards winning, but focusing fully on trying to save money.

http://www.freshnessmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/monopoly-luxury-tax.jpg

Star-divide

Clearly, this isn't Larry H. Miller's Utah Jazz anymore. Bless him, he was a competitor who wanted to win. Winning sometimes meant going with your heart and not your head. After all, any sane businessman would have sold his portion of the Jazz -- Miller was losing money on the Jazz in the early days. Instead, he chose to purchase the rest of the team, and keep them here. (here being operative, keep the team in Utah, not in Michigan where I'm writing this from) He also helped usher in winning seasons where no winning had ever been had previously. He wanted to win so badly that he even signed off on a $39 million dollar contract for Greg Ostertag. (And we like to joke about it, but if you look at his advanced stats, Ostertag was a defensive center who held his own against the average starting NBA center back in the 90's -- his blocks per foul ratio is something this current Jazz team sorely misses)

The apple appears to have fallen far from the tree. Greg Miller has gone on the radio to talk about his passion for competitive cycling. (really? was the luge bandwagon full?) His advisers (naming names here: Kevin O'Connor, Randy Rigby, Robert Hyde, Randy Wright and others in the Larry H Miller Companies board of directors) continually tell Miller that the Jazz are (in terms of profit) the 5th largest dealership in the business empire. If you want to just look at the Jazz as a money making business (aka. Donald Sterling-ing it) then please for the love of God sell the team.

The time for conservativism existed in the past (and I'm specifically talking about selling the draft rights of Dominique Wilkins to the Atlanta Hawks for cold hard cash), but that Jazz team was far from a serious contender. This team is not that Jazz team. This is a Jazz team that is winning half of their road games and swept the season series from the four time NBA Champion San Antonio Spurs. This hasn't happened since before Karl Malone used Rogaine.

It's exactly that conservativism that made Karl lose his hair in the first place. He spent the vast majority of his entire career being surrounded (outside of Stockton) with guys worse than the people D-Wade is playing with right now. (Mark Eaton was a great defender, nearly got 500 blocks in one season, and a former All-Star; Thurl Bailey was solid on both ends; Griffith had his best seasons back before Karl was having children out of wedlock; Ty Corbin was 'meh' personified; Jeff Malone did not have three point range as a guard; Jose Ortiz was the best player from a nation that did not make basketball players; Mike Brown was, uh, a poor man's Sharone Wright) The Jazz can't expect that the good players on this team will wait 15 years before the front office does something. (Can you imagine how much better the Jazz would have been if they had gotten Jeff Hornacek to pair up with Stockton and Malone back before they were all 34 years old?)

There is no guarantee that Deron Williams will stay here after his contract is up. Especially not if you take his recent quotes into account. (Thank god he got rid of his twitter, otherwise we'd have seen him get fined) Boozer, regardless of the fellatio he receives from a  Utah radio personality, is and always will be a mercenary. Andrei Kirilenko can continue giving his best years to Jerry Sloan in 22 mpg, or be a rock star in Russia after this contract is up. Memo, he already plays like he's on another team. The old ideas of loyalty do not exist in this NBA -- and when the players don't trust the front office, how can loyalty form in the first place?

Right now this Jazz franchise is going on a very conservative trajectory -- despite winning something like 16 of their last 18 games. Penny pinching now, with the hopes that the 'core' roster will stay together and be content with countless first round exits is lunacy. (Btw, Stockton and Malone were bounced in the first round more than 5 times in their careers. Why? Mainly because the front office didn't think to surround them with complimentary players to make them real threats in the playoffs -- but always just good enough to wrangle at least 1 playoff home game out of it.) (Back then the 1st round was best of 5)

Trading Brewer and Maynor in attempts to save money is a noble concept -- if the Jazz were able to get under the cap. Illusions of nobility aside, the Jazz have not even succeeded at that task. Utah's still over the cap -- and at the price of two young, promising guards who were key rotation players. The front office's naked ambition of fiscal, moral, victories -- instead of attempts to win deep in the playoffs -- is sickening.

There is no sure thing in the NBA, and you have to try to win when your team is playing well. (Remember that season the Hornets were second in the west? Yeah, since then they've never gotten back up to those heights. Remember that season the Heat won it all? Yup, injuries and lack of talent have prevented them from ever returning to the East Finals) Utah is playing great right now. I wish I could say the same for the front office.

The funny thing is that even closet Jazz fans are upset at what the Jazz brass are doing -- which is basically lying to the fans. (Remember that whole "if the team is good, we'll pay the tax" thing?)  Sadly, the front office perspective for this season (at least) isn't to try to win (otherwise the Jazz would have traded players for players back in return ... guys like Kevin Martin who fit a void in the Jazz offense) -- it's to try to save. And in following that second path, the Jazz franchise will ultimately fail at both this season.

~Amar

All comments are the opinion of the commenter and not necessarily that of SLC Dunk or SB Nation.

Comment 34 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Another “near” deadline deal that I didn’t write about was the Pau Gasol “trade”. That’s another example of a trade tipping the balance . . .

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 20, 2010 9:15 PM MST reply actions  

Boo!

Why’d you have to bring that back up.
I might have to un-rec this as a result… ;)

Free Koufosenko!
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter

by UtesFan89 on Feb 20, 2010 9:30 PM MST up reply actions  

you are too kind.

I think that we, as fans, have to live in a world where that trade happened. unless you want to get all “stats” into it, and we see that trade is outside of two standard deviations and pretend it didn’t happen.

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 20, 2010 10:00 PM MST up reply actions  

To be fair

That trade was freakin retarded and everyone in the NBA except Laker fans hates Memphis to this day for trading Gasol for jack squat.

I agree wtih you 100%. I’m probably going to take alot of heat for this but I’ve been a New York Yankee fan since I was old enough to swing a bat. If there is one thing the Yankees are hated for it’s the amount of money they spend to grab stars. That being said, they are an organization who has made a reputation for being able to spend big bugs to make a great core and supporting cast for their team. (whether you hate them or like them, you have to at least give them that).

That being said, I HATE when franchises are more concerned with the amount of money they are spending vs. pocketing, instead of focusing on staying competitve. Granted, the NBA is a business and I understand during a recession that paying for a Lux tax which is millions of dollars is hard to swallow. However, they didn’t get under the Lux Tax and they didn’t really get anying in return that made the deals even somewhat appealing. Maybe we’ll get lucky with that 2011 draft pick and be able to draft another superstar for D-will but I doubt it.

It frustrates me because I can understand both points of view. The Maynor/Harpring trade I can swallow because of how much money it saved. Ronnie Brewer for protected pick that doesn’t even get us under the tax and takes one of our better defenders away is frustrating.

I really hope, REALLY hope, the F.O. has a plan for all of this that is more than just trying to save money or they may have starte down a slippery slope that causes problems with D-Will and the other players around him. Not only that, the fans deserve something more then watching a team that could be pushed over the edge into a championship contender slip back to being medicore.

For the Love of the Game

by ForTheLove on Feb 20, 2010 9:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Here's the problem:

Dropping 2.5 mil here and there doesn’t save us any money. If they wanted to make money saving decisions, they would start by dropping Boozer and follow that up by trading Memo or paying somebody to take AK’s contract. Those are the kinds of “getting ready for free agency” financial moves that are meaningful. Dropping Brewer and Maynor didn’t open up any financial space to really sign anybody good.

I think they truly believe we have a championship contender in the core rotation right now. (And over the last 15 games, who can argue that?), so a little relief here and there to enable maintaining what we have is the best they could do. My problem with that is two words: Gasol Lakers. We have no answer to that.

I'll make it coach.

by MTN on Feb 20, 2010 9:54 PM MST reply actions  

This move was taking an eyedropper and sucking out a little bit of water, from a bucket of water

when it comes to ‘saving money’. Very poor move, if you ask me. (from a bball pov and from a financial move)

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 20, 2010 10:03 PM MST up reply actions  

after all

jazz now need to sign another player anyway, to get to the L minimum for a roster

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 20, 2010 10:03 PM MST up reply actions  

Brewer turned down an extension -

- and he got traded. He would probably still be on the team if he signed the extension. He wanted to make more, the FO wanted to save more. All the players on the team (and league) sign for as much as they possibly can, and they don’t worry about which teammates might get moved because of their contract. His teammates are sad he is leaving the team, but you better believe they are just as cut-throat about money as the owners… that’s why the chemistry won’t be hurt as bad as everyone thinks. Not to mention Price, Mathews, Korver, CJ, AK, and Millsap all know they will get more minutes because of it… and they all like to play.

Having Brewer this year or not was not going to be the difference in getting a championship. It hurts our depth, but not really our production at the position. Mathews is a better defender, Korver a better scorer. The production will equal out.

We are long shots to win the championship this year. But we are probably one great acquisition away from being true contenders. I feel we are like the Lakers right before they got Pau. We couldn’t make that move this year… but who knows next year maybe.

And bottom line is this: I actually think having the draft pick and a little smaller payroll is going to be more beneficial to making that big move (whatever it is -if we get a chance in the off season) then the benefit of the chance Brewer could have been used in a sign and trade. Remember, Brewer isn’t holding out for max money, he benefits nothing by holding out for a sign and trade when he could just sign with the team he wants to.

I am a Brewer fan, I love watching him play… but honestly, I think the FO made the right move.

by Frank5 on Feb 20, 2010 11:46 PM MST reply actions  

Im with you

I like Ronnie Brewer, but he’s Ronnie Brewer. We did not trade away Dwill for nothing. We didn’t trade Millsap for nothing. Brewer was a decent contributer, but the way some people are acting, it was like he was the key to a championship. Sorry, but he was not. Jazz will not skip a beat without him. The FO knew this. Plus, Matthews has more upside.

The bigger worry for me is how DWill feels about it. If the FO continue to make moves that piss him off, that is a bigger concern. But he is a pro.

by iidiot on Feb 21, 2010 2:55 AM MST up reply actions  

I think the main issue is the perspective of the FO

this FO does not trust/think that these players are true contenders. instead of making positive moves to become true contenders they are cutting players off the payroll in order to save money. DWill is in the business of winning. He’s not in the business of just sitting around trusting (blindly) that the FO will eventually reward his play with making trades for good players. DWill is not going to tough it out like Stockton for generations content to go to war with the team as it is.

That’s the big issue. Brewer is just the second move in the same season which gives us fans a clear idea of the direction the Jazz front office is heading towards. I’m sorry if my post was confusing. It’s not:

Ronnie Brewer = Championship

it was:

Winning—————— Front office —>>> Saving

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 21, 2010 9:48 AM MST up reply actions  

Making that big move:
And bottom line is this: I actually think having the draft pick and a little smaller payroll is going to be more beneficial to making that big move

The Jazz are already holding expirings in Korver’s $6m and Boozer’s $12m this season. Is that extra $3-4m (where Brewer’s next contract would have started) going to make a huge difference? I can’t say for sure, but will the Jazz really want to pay someone more than $18m a season? I say no, especially with our state regarding the cap.

The Jazz and draft picks, on the other hand, are a whole other mess. Sure, we lucked into the Knicks pick, but aside from that, we owe Minny one 1st rounder soon, we also owe Philly one 2nd rounder (Fes trade). We haven’t been great with using these ‘assets’. After all, we still have Ante Tomic as an ‘asset’ that no team seems to want. Furthermore, I see the Jazz moving backwards in regards to these picks. Brewer was a lotto pick. We’re not getting a lotto pick in return. So we’re effectively traded down. That’s not even a sideways move.

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 21, 2010 9:43 AM MST up reply actions  

Great write-up

I feel like decisions like this must really affect how the players feel. By not trying to bring someone in to help the Jazz get over the hump, management is basically telling them that they’re not good enough to be worth the investment.

Pretty disappointing.

by vizzle07 on Feb 21, 2010 1:44 AM MST reply actions  

Yes.

This is what I was trying to get at.

We’ve seen this before as Jazz fans with how Stockton and Malone played for years with “barely making the playoff” talent. We don’t need to re-create the fail wheel for a decade again. The Jazz are winning now, sitting on our hands would be one thing. Actively getting rid of talent (on the other hand) is the opposite of what the Jazz need to be doing.

D-Will sees Dallas going out and making trades to try to get better NOW. He sees Utah doing the opposite. In 3 yrs when Jason Kidd retires and D-Will is a free agent don’t you think Cuban at al aren’t going to make Deron at least look at Dallas?

What’s keeping Deron in Utah? Management that wants to trade away starters for draft picks in the 16-22 range?

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 21, 2010 9:51 AM MST up reply actions  

I don't think the issue for jazz fans (and players) isn't just the fact that Brewer got traded.

    
      The trade of Ronnie Brewer in of itself isn’t really the issue. I think the Front Office is correct in regards to getting Wesley more minutes. Wesley is also good defensively, and he is without a doubt a better shooter. As far as basketball goes, this move won’t really hurt the jazz. Even though I liked Maynor, the Jazz don’t seem to be any worse without him.

    The only problem is that the Jazz certainly aren’t any better. I think the fans and players expected the Front Office to get the team better so they can have a chance when they face the elite teams in the playoffs, especially when these teams pose serious match up issues for the Jazz. The Front Office certainly failed in that regard, and I think that was the bulk of the frustration that DWill and the rest of the players were expressing when they voiced their displeasure. Then, the Jazz traded Brewer.

    So, the Jazz weren’t willing to get better, but they were fine about trading a player that was a solid defensive presence, a fantastic finisher, and a great locker room guy just to save a couple million, plus it doesn’t even get your team under luxury tax.

 
The bottom line is this: The Jazz needed to do something to counter the length and athleticism of the Lakers (Gasol, Kobe), and Nuggets (Melo; Birdman). Instead, all they did was trade a decent/popular locker room player away for a draft pick. If I was DWill, I’d be irked too.

For the record, I’m glad DWill is speaking his mind about these moves. Kobe was doing the same thing a few years ago, threatening to leave (remember when the internet was spouting pictures of him in a Bulls uni?) So, Tell em Dwill! Star players can have an impact on FO decisions. Maybe it will do the same for the Jazz what it did for the Lakers.

by brock38 on Feb 21, 2010 3:45 AM MST reply actions  

agreed

agree with pretty much all your points, Brewer was a great team player that’s why i think people are mad, but the truth is his offensive potential was severely limited, he’s unlikely to ever be considered a shooting threat in this league. he was slightly improving in other areas but still the jazz will be fine without him with what they have. Maynor doesn’t have the physical attributes you’d like to see in point guards so unless he has a stockton-like work ethic i just can’t see him doing much in this league.

The real problem is our FO has been content with putting out a team that is good enough to get fans in the seats but nothing more. Trading Brewer & Maynor away isn’t going to hurt the fanbase a whole lot.

by utahmanami on Feb 21, 2010 4:07 AM MST up reply actions  

+1

Free Koufosenko!
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter

by UtesFan89 on Feb 21, 2010 11:24 AM MST up reply actions  

Greg Miller is really a scapegoat for Jazz fans

To say that things would be so much better if Larry were still around is totally inaccurate. Larry himself said many times that he would never pay the luxury tax unless it would basically guarantee a championship. This team currently is nowhere near guaranteed champions.

Saying that the team would be better off if the Millers sold is crazy. The entire reason that the Jazz are still playing in Utah is because of Larry Miller and his company. As soon as the Jazz are sold they will become the next Sonics.

When i heard about the Brewer trade i was really upset, but having had a couple of days to digest it, it really isn’t that bad. The fact is that we are still a luxury tax paying team, which is something we wouldn’t have been if Larry was still around, so to say that Greg Miller isn’t willing to spend to be competitive is rubbish. To expect him to spend whatever it takes to win a championship isn’t realistic, or feasible in the Utah market. The Jazz will never be able to outspend the other teams. If the team was based in New York, then that’s a different story, but the fact is we are a small market team.

I like Greg Miller because he has been willing to explain his decisions and didnt hide the fact that the Maynor trade was all about saving money. To say that the Jazz aren’t going to win a championship because of the ownership is crazy. They are only playing in Utah because of the ownership… He has been willing to pay the luxury tax despite the fact that his business in general has taken a hit over the last couple of years and to me that shows that there is a commitment to winning.

by sherbs on Feb 21, 2010 9:11 AM MST reply actions  

We have different definitions of "commitment to winning"

Larry saved the UTAH Jazz. I know this and am grateful for it. He was passionate about the Jazz beyond money. I would only wish for the current ownership to sell the team if they continue to focus on bean counting, instead of banner counting. (and only wish for the team to be sold to another group that would keep the team in utah at that)

The Jazz have never been more successful than they were under Larry’s ownership. He was willing to take risks and balanced loyalty with progress (mostly). He didn’t ask for Sloan to be canned some seasons when the Jazz underperformed at the start of seasons — he didn’t ask the team to make trades just to make trades either. He did, on the other hand, really get into the Jazz as more than an owner. He wanted to win and bit the financial bullet at times, in order to put out the best product available. (AK’s contract comes to mind)

What have we seen, since Greg took over? I haven’t been overwhelmed with Greg’s “commitment to winning” so far. Maybe what he’s done is good enough for you. That’s cool.

He has big shoes to fill.

Moreover, I think it’s the advisers Miller has more than just Greg himself. (I named names, btw, look them up). Those guys coupled with Greg’s lack of overt ‘passion’ for the Jazz hurts the team. Suggesting that having a franchise owned by a guy who wasn’t nuts for that franchise is a good thing is silly. How many casino owners do well, if they aren’t really passionate about their business? How many car dealerships stand out, if their owner doesn’t care for cars?

Hopefully Greg will develop Jazz fever. For the sake of the players and fans.

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 21, 2010 10:16 AM MST up reply actions  

His first step

as CEO of the Miller group was to bite the financial bullet and sign CJ Miles, a move that Larry said he wouldn’t have made. Yes I agree things were great when Larry was running the ship, but that doesn’t mean that things would be better now.

realistically though, I don’t believe that the Jazz would be able to afford to keep Brewer next year. If he were only asking for 3-4 mil a year then I’m sure the Jazz would have kept him, but it sounds like he was wanting Millsap money. Even if h e was asking for Korver money I would say to let him walk.

The fact is that the Jazz can’t afford to consistently be a luxury tax paying team if the franchise is going to remain viable. When it is no longer viable that is when we’re going to see the team sold and become the Seattle Jazz or wherever else the new owners want to move the team to.

by sherbs on Feb 21, 2010 10:36 AM MST up reply actions  

Biting

The bullet to sign Cj Miles turned out to be a retarded move. No Cj = Brewer, less tax to pay, minor logjam at sg/sf.

I wouldn’t use that example to talk up Greg. Just sayin.

For the Love of the Game

by ForTheLove on Feb 21, 2010 1:56 PM MST up reply actions  

Not talking that move up

I agree, in hindsight it doesn’t look like it was the best move he could have made, just making the point that at the time it was a move that was a risk and he was willing to take it even though it did cost the team.

At the time I remember thinking that CJ was due to have a break out year and hoping that he would match the offer… fingers crossed we get more games from him like the last one!

by sherbs on Feb 21, 2010 4:01 PM MST up reply actions  

Looking to the future

This summer we have a possible lottory pick. We were loosing Brewer anyway. We may also loose Korver. I think the FO knows this. They also know we are a long shot at a title. Nobody available would have pushed us over the edge to championships. Martin is not a defender. Now we get to see how our swing men react with more minutes. Nobody (CJ) will have to force as much when they are in. this should improve us. The GOlden STate game shows DWILL was upset. He didn’t play well. He needs to get over it. If he wants to blame someone he can look in the mirror. Money was more important than winning to him also.

by neds on Feb 21, 2010 9:27 AM MST reply actions  

That my point, Brewer was leaving anyways.

We didn’t trade Brewer for first round pick, we traded 30 games of Brewer for a first round pick. It is not a “latteral” or less move, it was a good move.

Of course DWill acted upset. Brewer was his friend. But people are over reacting to think this means he is leaving Utah. Anyone remember when Karl Malone swore he was leaving if they let Ike Austin go (right before they let Ike Austin go)?

by Frank5 on Feb 21, 2010 10:00 AM MST up reply actions  

I was going to bring up Ike Austin . . .

But Malone isn’t DWill. Malone would say stuff ALL THE TIME, but deep down he was a loyal dog who trusted the front office would do its job eventually.

DWill, on the other hand, is not usually outspoken. DWill is also really bad at hiding his emotions when he’s really upset. Hence: this recent tantrum. I don’t think the Jazz can AFFORD to over-react when it comes to placating Deron. If he leaves, the Jazz will be no better than a lotto team.

I like the idea of trading someone who is leaving “anyway” (like we know for certain Brewer was gone — just because he didn’t take the lowball offer from the Jazz doesn’t mean he’s gone. Why would he leave here to go sit on the bench on a worse team, when he starts for a top West team?) — why didn’t we trade Korver and Boozer? (Kover’s all but hinted that he kinda wants to go where LeBron does from interviews over the summer in his hometown)

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 21, 2010 10:05 AM MST up reply actions  

I think D-Will is a max player

You can’t expect these guys to go old man Karl Malone on the Lakers at this stage of their careers. This was D-Will’s first ‘real’ contract as his Rookie deal finished. These are the players the league has right now. (Shaq turned down $100 from the lakers for $120 back in the day — the lakers had to get rid of more players in order to do it)

I’m not satisfied that we have quality swingmen. AK is the only guy I really love out of the bunch. He’s a playoff vet who has played well in the clutch before. He’s the type of guy good teams have. I haven’t been sold on Kover or CJ this year. (Korver, mainly because he’s missed a lot of time — CJ, well, for all his twitter talk about getting better, he really hasn’t) Wes is a great idea.

We all love him, but we don’t actually know what his true potential is. We know that Brewer’s game was hurting this year because there was no real floor spacing for him to exploit (because Memo, Korver, DWill were all injured at points of the season). We don’t know what Wes is going to end up being. He could be better than Brewer over-all, or he could just end up being Shandon Anderson on the Knicks. It’s too soon to tell.

We’re always going to be a long shot to win the title when they team has no way to counter the two teams ahead of us in the standings (LAL, DEN). It would have been nice to see the Jazz make a move that’s a basketball move for once.

As for Martin — I don’t think it had to be a Brewer for Martin type of trade. If we know anything about our team, we can’t field a “just offense” lineup and then a “just defense” lineup. We need balance — if you have Martin on the floor, you’re always going to need to pair him up with a Kirilenko, Brewer or Matthews. There were ways to get Martin. (Sac would not have said ‘no’ to a Boozer and Korver deal for Martin and junk) These were just not ways that our front office wanted to try.

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 21, 2010 10:01 AM MST up reply actions  

But even if they get Martin

It’s not a move that is going to put them over the top. In fact, if you trade Boozer and Korver for Martin you are regressing this year. It’s not a move that is going to help us beat the Lakers unless Martin grows another 5 inches and works out how to defend Gasol and Odom…

by sherbs on Feb 21, 2010 10:29 AM MST up reply actions  

getting rid of boozer on defense

means actually having to play one of our languishing 7 footers on defense against their bigs — instead of rolling the dice with a 6’8 and 6’9 frontline with Boozer and Millsap. The height and length of the lakers is what hurts us most. Defending that height and length with guys they can just shoot and rebound over is a recipe for failure (as we’ve all seen).

If the brewer trade for nothing is addition by subtraction (giving playing time to other guys who can do a good job), removing boozer is the same type of move on the defensive end. Right? More time on defense at the 4 for Millsap and Kirilenko, and more time on defense at the 5 for Memo, the Koof and Fes. I’m just looking for internal consistency here, as a fan.

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 21, 2010 10:35 AM MST up reply actions  

Sorry but unless the Jazz added a player that helped the Kings (and Ronnie Brewer isn't it sorry)

There was no way the Jazz would have gotten Martin. The Rockets got Martin because of the cap relief the Kings got plus Carl Landry whose cheap and productive. The Jazz weren’t really going to be able to absorb Martin at what he makes without sending a high contract most Jazz fans would have been opposed to sending out (like AK47). At that point, it would have made any deal complicated.

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16

by pookeyguru on Feb 22, 2010 5:20 AM MST up reply actions  

Ronnie B

As upset I was about the Maynor deal, I feel like this one was a good move. Personally I really like Ronnie B, great guy, good team mate, very athletic, kept his mouth shut and so on. I hated to see him go- with that being said, as a Jazz fan from 1979 I think it was a smart move to clear up the logjam at the 2 position.

People say he was our best on-ball defender, wow, that doesn’t say much for our defense as a team. While Ronnie was a terrific athelete- which we have needed for a long time, I felt he was in the bottom half of all the Jazz players defensively. Ronnie could not keep his man from the basket. I felt his basketball IQ was fairly low. He, like CJ, never seem to pick up on an opponent’s tendencies. He could be guarding a guy all game long and never realize that a player always went to his right and try to force him left. Matthews on the other hand usually picks up a players tendencies after just a few plays.

I like the fact the 3 headed monster at the 2 position can matchup with most teams or create advantages against most teams. Plus Deron and Ronnie P can play there as well.

I understand Deron’s angst with losing his friend. Maybe he should have told the FO last year, "no I’ll take a couple of million less each year so that we can keep Ronnie B. When these guys are getting their huge max contracts, they forget that somewhere down the road, someone is going to lose their job because of it- especially in a small market like Utah. John Stockton understood this, Karl Malone never learned that lesson, that is why he’ll go into the HOF with no ring to show for all of his hard work.

by rippinjazz on Feb 21, 2010 4:04 PM MST reply actions  

That was my point

I would love to see a super star player like Deron or LBJ or Kobe step up at their big contract take a little less. sign it. then when interviewed by the media tell them I took less to bring other great players and win a championship. Proffessional basketball is not about winning. It is about making money. The league, teams, and players are only there to make money.

by neds on Feb 21, 2010 4:53 PM MST up reply actions  

So

Ilgauskas is near a buy out of his contract witht he wizards. Apparently, there is speculation that the NBA will bar him from rejoining the Cavs….

DEAR GREG MILLER AND COMPANY.

If you are as commited to winning as you claim you are, you will do anything reasonably in your power to grab this man. He can give us the length and defense to hang against Denver, LA, Cavs, Celtics, etc.

Do it,

Sincerly ForTheLove and many others of the SLCdunk fan club

For the Love of the Game

by ForTheLove on Feb 21, 2010 5:16 PM MST reply actions  

rather play Fes

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 22, 2010 4:36 AM MST up reply actions  

Bring back 00

They might as well sign him back.

by KaBar6 on Feb 21, 2010 7:12 PM MST via mobile reply actions  

see above

Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Visit my blog: http://allthatjazzbasketball.blogspot.com/
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .

by AllThatJazzBasketball on Feb 22, 2010 4:36 AM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Dr Jekyll Meet the Jazz
Small
Youth vs. Veteran Minutes and Player Assessments
Bb_image_small
KOC is on the clock
Dwill-jail_small
More Trade Ideas
Small
Karl Malone had to buy a scalped ticket to see his former team play
Thereisawar_small
Fan Commandments!
Pistonsfwlogo_small
Herein lies the problem...
Green-bay-packers---nfl-2011-champions_small
The Choice
12068_small
Worth taking a look?
Bigpapi1_small
The Jazz Fan Wave!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Uf_medium 

More great SB Nation Blogs


Stockton to Malone

Utahjazz_small clarkpojo

Allthatamar_wip_small AllThatJazzBasketball

Starters

Jerry-b_small moni

Ppr-3_small prodigal punk

Myprofile_small Yucca Man

2012-01-03_21-25-16_231_small dianaallen

Bench Threats

New-player-of-utah-jazz-enes-kanter-2011-06-24_v_small UtesFan89

John-stockton-300b0518_small TazzJazzFan

Jackpotting HOF

Megajazznew_small Shums

Slcdunk_logo_three_colors_small Basketball Kris