Offensive Efficiency 101
Quick Quiz: Who is the better scorer, Melo or Corey Maggette? Are you sure?
This post might seem pretty juvenile to many of you, but I thought I would take a minute to explain my thoughts on what makes a player a good offensive player. Some stat nerds like David Locke and John Hollinger have formulas to determine a good offensive player. In my opinion those formulas can weigh something too heavily, such as "amount of touches" or rebounding. Larry H. Miller and Marc Cuban have both developed "formulas" which basically make Andrei Kirilenko and Jason Kidd seem like MVP candidates.
For me it is simple. I don't care if you have the ball at the top of the key 3 times a team possession, or if you shoot most of your shots from 15 feet out. I don't care how many points you score between 14 and 19 on the shot clock. To me it is just, "how often do you score points for the team when you shoot the ball?" My simple offensive efficiency is points per shot attempt.
Monta Ellis is a top scorer in this league and some would consider him a borderline all-star. Is he a good scorer? Absolutely not. He is one of the worst scorers in the league. He just shoots tons of shots. Seventy-five percent of the league could average 20 points a game if they were allowed to shoot the ball 20 times. On the flipside, Kevin Martin is one of the underrated scorers in the league, which is saying a lot since he has been a top 10 scorer in this league. He makes his shots count.
The only two things that should be considered here are assisting another player to get points himself and turnovers (which I will explain later). Until they start measuring points produced per assist, I can't quantify assists correctly. But simply and bare-boned, when you shoot a shot, do you produce? Points per shot attempt. Now it should be noted that there are two ways to increase your PPS (points per shot). The first way is to increase your overall field goal percentage. increasing your 3 point field goal percentage helps even quicker. The second way, is to draw fouls when you shoot. If you shoot a shot and have a foul called, you either get a 0/0 mark or a 1/1 mark. You can't hurt your fg % when you are fouled; you can only help it. So lets take a look at some current Jazz men, past Jazz men and other so called "scorers" in the league. These numbers come from the 09-10 season, unless otherwise noted.
Deron Williams 1.34
Raja Bell 1.20
Wes Matthews 1.36
Andrei Kirilenko 1.43
Paul Millsap 1.34
Carlos Boozer: 1.38
(Post injury) 1.15
Al Jefferson
(Pre injury) 1.20
Mehmet Okur 1.27
CJ Miles 1.11
Kyle Korver 1.34
Ronnie Price 1.08
Sundiata Gaines 1.27
Kyrylo Fesenko 1.37
Kosta Koufos 1.15
Kevin Durant 1.48
Lebron James 1.47
Carmelo Anthony 1.29
Kobe Bryant 1.26
Dwyane Wade 1.35
Monta Ellis 1.16
Chris Bosh 1.46
Amare Stoudemire 1.5
Corey Maggette 1.56
Dwight Howard 1.8
Kevin Martin 1.43
I mentioned that turnovers can skew the data. If you turn the ball over more than the average player then you still might have a high points per shot attempt even though you are hurting your team's offense. Dwight Howard has above average turnovers. He also doesn't hit his free throws, which hurts his PPS. But look at how much higher his PPS is than every other player in the league. Can you only imagine what an offensive force he would be if he could limit his turnovers (probably mostly made up of offensive fouls) and hit his free throws?
Other notable numbers: This is why I believe that Paul Millsap can replace Carlos Boozer's offensive production. He is just as efficient as Boozer in my mind. He just shoots half the shots. Also, the Miami Heat are going to shoot tons and tons of free throws every game. Wade, Lebron and Bosh are all very good at getting to the line, increasing their individual PPS numbers.
Cj Miles needs to improve his offensive efficiency. I think we all know this. I also find Al Jefferson's numbers disturbing, but I will give him a pass, since he played for a horrible team that solely relied on his one on one moves in the post. But if he has similar numbers after a season with the Jazz, there will be need for worry.
Raja Bell also has a low PPS, but his 3 point shooting is so good, I think he will do well in the Jazz system. It's something else to keep an eye on for sure.
Kobe Bryant is not a super efficient offensive player. I believe we all knew this already.
Ak is sneakily efficient on offense. He achieves this by drawing a high rate of fouls. I have always thought Corey Maggette would fit nicely with the Jazz. He draws fouls like Bob Ross drew beautiful natural scenes. All the time.
So the next time someone calls Carmelo Anthony or Monta Ellis, or Kosta Koufos "great scorers in the league," tell them to think again.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
yes
Total Points / Total Shot Attempts is basically the “shooting worth” stat that I put into my stat blocks. I think it’s important because it favors not just people who take good shots, but also guys who get to the FT line (which has the added benefit of getting the other team in foul trouble). The over-all average that I use (because any stats need a frame of reference) is 1.20 points / shot attempt.
Guys like Iverson (career) are average (at best), while guys like Malone were significantly above average. I think this is a good, quality stat, but it doesn’t explain everything. After all, it’s a stat, so it can be manipulated.
Haywards ‘shooting worth’ (as I put it) for the Summer league was way higher than his regular season one will be because he did not miss from the line, and hardly missed from the field.
Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Check out: slcdunk.com
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .
by AllThatJazzBasketball on Aug 5, 2010 4:48 PM MDT reply actions
What if?
This has nothing to do with this post.
DOminique Wilkens was drafted by the Jazz, but then traded for cash.
Would a Stockton-Hornacek-Wilkins-Malone team have won a championship?
Interesting to wonder
It's likely,
The Jazz wouldn’t have been able to finacially surive if they hadn’t traded Wilkens. The team was strugggling financially mightly and that traded single handidly kept the team afloat untill Miller bought it out right.
For the Love of the Game
Stockton to Malone- The perfect combination!!
"I think he just said, 'Oh my Gosh,' or whatever they say in Provo."- ESPN talking about QB. Max Hall after BYU defeated third ranked Oklahoma (2009).
MonSTARZ forever!
The Jazz would have been a great team
w/ Eaton, Nique, Stockton . . . don’t know if they would have been in draft position to also nab Malone next season though.
Even if it was the hypothetical situation of Stockton, Nique and Malone — financially, it may not have even been the “Utah” jazz by that point.
Follow me on Twitter: AllThatAmar
Check out: slcdunk.com
E-Mail me at: allthatjazzbasketball@hotmail.com
Really, I'm totally not lonely or anything . . .
by AllThatJazzBasketball on Aug 5, 2010 6:25 PM MDT up reply actions
Yea
that was my point. It wouldn’t have been here.
For the Love of the Game
Stockton to Malone- The perfect combination!!
"I think he just said, 'Oh my Gosh,' or whatever they say in Provo."- ESPN talking about QB. Max Hall after BYU defeated third ranked Oklahoma (2009).
MonSTARZ forever!
come on clark
Whats with the cheapshot at the koof? His confidence was at an all time high after he found out that he was being traded straight up for Al Jefferson. But now he is being compared with carmelo and ellis?
We all know that The Koof is THE greatest scorer in the league, and maybe even the world.
Marginal returns
While your metric may be good as a blunt instrument, it doesn’t take into account either volume or marginal values. If a player passes the ball every time he doesn’t have an uncontested layup or dunk, then he will have an offensive efficiency (officiency?) essentially equal to two. He will also be a liability to his team, because they need more production out of him than he is providing. The Nuggets would rather Carmelo go 7/18 than 2/2.
The right officiency for a player depends on what options are available. In strict Game Theory terms, the optimal outcome would be for every player on the team to have the same officiency. That way the expected value of shooting would be identical to the expected value of passing and the defense couldn’t overplay either option. But we’re not here to talk about Game Theory; we’re here to talk about basketball.
I live in Central Florida, so I see a lot of Magic basketball. I think most people who watch Orlando closely would agree that passing to Dwight Howard is not an efficient offensive strategy. It’s a necessary strategy, because if he doesn’t get the ball he doesn’t stay engaged on defense. But Dwight’s high officiency rating comes from the fact that he’s good at dunking offensive rebounds, not from the fact that he’s a good offensive weapon.
My point is that not all touches are equal, not all shots are comparable, and teams are not looking for the best of all possible shots. On any given possession, a team is working for the best available shot. Sometimes that means you need Carmelo jacking up a contested jumper, and sometimes that means that a player rebounds his own miss and puts it back in. Your statistics may not favor these things, but maximizing statistics and winning basketball games are often at cross purposes.
Very good comment, El Agua
I’m willing to cut Clarkpojo major slack on this one, however. Writing such an interesting article smack dab in the middle of offseason demands mighty dedication.
may the spirit of Bob Ross smile down on us
And bless us with a happy little title right over here in SLC!
by Juan B on Aug 6, 2010 1:33 AM MDT via mobile reply actions
minutes
have to play in somewhow, some players can come in the game and play 15 minutes, go 5-5 and have great efficiency every time they touch the ball. Millsap seems to me as one of those players. I think to take it one step further you should take the number of shots taken and divide by minutes played to get a true reading of a players efficiency.
Time played
I have always been interested in player production versus mpg. Players like Denvers Birdman come in for 10-15 minutes a game give 8 points 4 rebounds and a block. When he is forced to play extended minutes his production only goes up a tiny bit if at all. I hope we don’t see this with Millsap.

by 























