And where will the team go from here?
It was a tough last couple of games.
It was tough because the team finally looked like the Jazz we dreamed of, because the offense was clicking, because we got a season's worth of highlights in two games, because those highlights reminded us of the awesome stretch last year ...
BUT
And it's that BUT that makes us a little gloomy. It happened against two teams the Jazz were supposed to defeat. It happened against two teams with ghastly defense. It happened against two teams that don't come close to resembling the tough opponents in the West. And on and on. There were a thousand ways to talk ourselves out of getting hopeful.
And yet we still feel hopeful. Because, even though all those things are true the Jazz played crummy teams and crummy defenses in December and November, and they never clicked like THAT.
So we hope. Then we kick ourselves for getting our hopes up. Then we hide in a closet and laugh giddily. Then we come out and berate ourselves for setting ourselves up for the inevitable letdown.
But there are a couple things in these recent games that I'm simply stoked about.
I love the rotations Jerry is settling into and playing around with
In both games AK was the first starter pulled out for a rest, in both halves. Then he came out again and played the PF spot with the bench. It is pretty much the ideal way to dole out his playing time. He plays so well with the bench because Earl's style meshes with AK's skills so perfectly.
I love the lineup of Memo, AK, CJ, Ronnie, and Earl. It's simply golden. I will definitely miss the Fes and Elson frontcourt. But there's no doubt that a healthy Memo paired with AK is simply better.
I love that Sloan is playing Gordon to end the 1st half. It gives Hayward real playing time, when both teams are still doing their best to win ... but it's not in a situation where a single gaffe could cost the Jazz the game. It's a great spot for Gordon to get experience, build confidence, and earn more playing time.
I loved Sloan's lineup to start the 4th against NY: Al, AK, CJ, Deron, Earl. My bet is it's temporary. That it happened mostly because they're trying to limit Memo's minutes. But what it does is gives 3 of our slow-start-starters the chance to develop better habits with the leaders of SWARM. And it was Al's presence I particularly loved. I think he's in the most need of developing good habits in this area.
I love keeping Earl at PG with Deron at SG for a few minutes in both halves. I love it because Earl is the heart of SWARM, he's the best backup PG we've ever had (including Eisley, methinks), and it lets Deron capitalize on his absurdly effective scoring this year without worrying about doing the regular PG stuff.
I love that Jerry played both 4th quarters with guys who were playing really well. One of the most common criticisms regarding Sloan is he sticks to a particular substitution pattern regardless of what's happening in the game. Well, it didn't happen those two games. He went with different lineups, lineups that made sense according to who was playing well each game.
Other stuff I have loved
More than anything else, I love Earl's energy and defensive tenacity. He is just something to behold. And I don't care what his scoring average is compared to CJ's, Earl is the real 6th Man of the team. In fact, I'm already preparing a plethora of rants to post this season about how important it is for the Jazz to resign Earl—it will make what I said about Wesley Matthews last summer look like a couple scribbles on a napkin.
I loved that the starting lineup actually looked alive in both 1st quarters. I actually wish I could go back and rewatch the games, just to try to pinpoint exactly how they were different. Though it may have been they simply attacked and dunked the ball from the beginning.
And the dunks! Holy crap, the dunks! AK, Al, Millsap, CJ all going in the paint for dunks. Like multiple times. So now we know the really can do it.
And the transition baskets and fast breaks! The team is simply so much better when they push the tempo and play briskly. I saw Deron's casual little trot up the court so much less. Even off opponents' made baskets, there was a whole lot more running across midcourt than walking.
SWARM will win more wars than they will lose. They're just too active, too tenacious. And it all starts with Earl. I'd be so pissed off at him if I was an opposing PG with him buzzing around me, bumping me, swiping for the ball every other second. My golly, it is beautiful to behold.
Stuff to I have to hope they'll work on and eventually figure out
Plain old regular solid, but not great defense.
They can't do SWARM defense for 48 minutes. It simply can't be done. But what they need to do is play decent, solid defense the other times. Trading baskets kind of defense. So a 20-point lead stays a 20-point lead. The problem was in these two games I saw either SWARM or an atrocity. Giving up a 20-point lead within 6 minutes kind of "defense." That won't do. The relaxed defense has to still be solid.
Mental toughness.
I noticed this two Fridays ago—the Jazz/Hawks game. The Jazz got down big early again. They fought back to within 8-10. Their defense really picked up. There were several posessions the Jazz played great D for the entire shot-clock, but the Hawks ended up scoring on a tough shot anyway. Our guys' shoulders immediately slumped, heads nodded back in frustration, and they all let out a collective, weary sigh. I could almost hear their thoughts: "we play great defense and they still score."
Well, that won't work. Honestly scoring two points in basketball is one of the easiest things to do in all of sports. The greatest defenses in the league give up almost 2 points per minute. That's once every other possession. The best defense in the universe will get scored on a lot.
But great, energized, frenzied, tough defense WILL give up scores on only 6-7 out of 20 possessions instead of 10 or 11. You have to think long-term. "We didn't beat them this time down the court, but we'll make life miserable for them for 8 straight minutes and in the long-term, it will make a difference."
It's kind of like Hank Aaron's answer when asked what it is like knowing he'll get a couple hits every game. He said he didn't know if he'd get two hits at any game. But if he didn't, he'd sure as hell get them the next.
We didn't see mental toughness against the Knicks or the Cavs because they crumpled into a heap the instant intense defense came up. The real test is how the team reacts when they play tough defense for 3 straight possessions—and give up scores each time. Do the Jazz give up? Or do they stick with it, knowing that in the long run it will make a difference.
That's what I hope we can see this road trip.
Other than that, there was a lot to be excited about. Al played and shot very well. Millsap played well and got to rest his sore hip. AK was spectacular, especially as the PF with SWARM. Raja played great. Deron was happy. Earl was awesome. CJ shot well and only took about 3 shots he shouldn't have. Ronnie was great. Gordon got playing time. Memo was really good—especially on the other things besides his shot.
And that was the best. Because sometimes shots don't fall and the question is: What else can you do to hep the team win?
For a couple of games, at least, the answer for everybody was "a helluva lot."
All comments are the opinion of the commenter and not necessarily that of SLC Dunk or SB Nation.
8 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I have a question.
I too like AK at the 4 but i hate having to limit milsap minutes. What is it that we love about AK at the 4 is it his defense against other 4’s or offense? I know milsap said he doesn’t like playing the 3. But i think he would be great at it. He is a much better shooter than ak and he is great at driving to the rim with his plethora of spins. He also could take some threes that we love to see him take (at least i love it when he takes them). He is also a lot quicker than we give him credit. WE could also have him guard the 4 on defense (if we wanted) and play the 3 on offense.
What thinkest thou SLCdunkites?
I don't think AK at 4 will necessarily limit Millsap's minutes
My hunch is Millsap’s minutes were limited in these two games because a) other guys were doing well, and b) Millsap’s still recovering from the injury that made him miss the Hawks game. It’s a hunch, because I haven’t heard anything (it’s so nice to NOT hear about guys’ lingering aches all the time—so nice to be able to assume they’re playing through pain).
But if you break AK’s minutes down this way:
1st qtr: 6 minutes at SG, 6 on bench
2nd: 6 minutes at PF (Millsap on bench), 6 minutes at SF (Millsap back out)
3rd: 6 minutes at SG, 6 on bench
4th: 6 minutes at PF (Millsap on bench), 6 minutes at SF (Millsap back out)
AK’s playing 12 minutes at PF, 24 at SF. Millsap’s still putting up 36 at PF.
I think that’s the kind of rotation Jerry’s kind of settling into. It will never be so exact, but it still seems to be what the team is going toward. And I think it’s perfect.
I got the crap beat out of me in Provo one time
Where will Okurs minutes come from?
He’ll obviously play more than El-Senko. Will they get shaved from Jefferson, Millsap or AK?
Andrei Kirilenko is Russia's most important export
Your guess is as good as mine
My hunch is that both Al and Millsap will see their minutes go down slightly as Memo’s go up. Eventually I expect things will level off at about 32 minutes for both Al and MIllsap, with about 20 for Memo.
And that kind of minute shaving will be a good thing in the long run, I expect. Now the only issue is getting Deron’s minutes down a bit as well so he doesn’t burn out.
I got the crap beat out of me in Provo one time
Not to be too cute about it
but I’m pretty sure John Stockton is the best backup PG the team has ever had.
by El Aguacil on Jan 17, 2011 10:38 AM MST reply actions 1 recs
El Aguacil for the win!
Yeah, after careful deliberation I’d take ’87 Stockton.
I got the crap beat out of me in Provo one time

by 




















