Should the Jazz Trade for Chris Paul?
Before you read the title of this post and immediately flip to the next channel, just hear me out. For many of you the answer to this question is a resounding "NO!" because there is no way in the Uintah Mountains that Paul would sign an extension with the Jazz after this season. But maybe that doesn't matter.
The thing of it is that the Jazz could offer the Hornets a better package than the ones that are being reported. It is unclear exactly what is being offered but so far the offers are something in the ballpark of Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, Ekpe Udoh from the Warriors, Eric Bledsoe, Al Farouq-Aminu, and the unprotected Wolves pick for 2012 from the Clippers and some package around Andrew Bynum from the Lakers.
The Jazz could turn and offer Devin Harris, Enes Kanter and Golden State's 2012 pick we hold and at least match, if not trump both Golden State and the Clippers' offers. The Lakers' offers are crappy, no matter how much ESPN will tell you otherwise. There is no way the NBA-owned Hornets are going to risk a coup by trading Paul to the Lakers. But is trading for Paul worth it for the Jazz? If you think that Paul might reconsider and resign with the Jazz long term after seeing a future with Favors, Hayward, and Burks then this trade is a no brainer.
But you'd have to consider it even if you thought Paul would be a one and done deal. Notice how I said consider it, not do it. For one, it would be the only way to really give the Jazz a much better chance of making the playoffs THIS year. I don't know if it still guarantees it. Plus, there is no certainty that New Orleans would see the pick the Jazz would trade them for the 2012 draft. Worst case scenario is that the Jazz would make the playoffs, miss out on their own pick and Golden State's pick right before Paul signs a free agent contract with the Knicks. But even then, you would have a Jazz team in the playoffs, which despite what you hear from Jazz fans, probably isn't happening this year without a blockbuster trade like this. On top of that the Knicks would try to do a sign and trade to maximize signing Paul, so there would be opportunity to get something from NY after renting Paul for a year. Anyway, just something to think about. The Jazz are in a position to gamble, if they want to be risk takers.
14 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If he will sign extension you give them more than that
but no point to lose 3 or more of our assets for one truncated season. Why would you trade for some one who will not sign an extension for you?
Paul wouldn't do much for us in the short term.
At best we’d have an outside chance at the playoffs. Certainly no reason to give up nearly everything we gained from trading D Will.
This is my rationale
I think we got as good a deal as we could hope for with DWill leaving, so I don’t see a need to gamble again.
The only reason you make this kind of move
is if you are a team that is A) deep enough to cover the losses of three players, and B) need one marquee player to put you over the top to make a title run. The Jazz aren’t close to either one. Part of rebuilding is keeping a young, talented core together. This move would only kick that can down the road for a best case scenario second round exit of a lockout shortened season. No thanks.
No Deal
I really want to see what Kanter’s got
If we could resign him, yes.
Otherwise – isn’t trading for him just making us go through exactly what we tried to avoid by trading Deron early? (If that makes any sense at all)
Med school owns my life at the current time.
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
SLC Dunk
I'm on Twitter
Im having a hard time saying yes
If he can stay healthy.
It looks like IMO he is going to end up like Brandon Roy with bad knees.
"I hate it! It looks like a stickup at 7-Eleven. Five guys standing there with their hands in the air."
Norm Sloan
"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors."
Weldon Drew
by EcERyda69 on Dec 7, 2011 8:59 AM MST via mobile reply actions
Absolutely Not
We trade a #3 pick, a 1st round draft pick in possibly the deepest draft ever, and then possibly lose another 1st round pick if we make the playoffs, just so we can watch Paul in a Jazz uniform for one year. No thanks
no way
Giving up Kanter and that Golden State pick is essentially trading away our future for a one time shot at MAYBE making the playoffs this year. Granted Kanter is an unproven player, but worst case scenario he ends up coming off the bench the rest of his career averaging 10-10. Chris Paul isn’t going to make us a contender, and I’d take another year off from the playoffs over trading away our future to watch him lead us all the way to a first round exit.
No way you give up Kanter.
You try to move even more salary by sending Al.
For the Love of the Game
Stockton to Malone- The perfect combination!!
MonSTARZ forever!
This is basically the DWill trade in reverse,
and we got off pretty good with that. CP3 wouldn’t resign here, no deal.
Took all offers and ran them through Trade Machine
Though, Paul wasn’t include. Just how the Jazz, Warriors and Clippers could swing a deal. Also only Jazz men used was Harris and Jefferson. I think I like the outcome:
Jazz gets: K. Thompson, S. Curry, Jeremy Lin
Warriors gets: Harris, Ryan Gomes, W. Warren
Clippers gets: Al Jefferson, Ekpe Udoh
Clippers don’t need two big men, so it probably wouldn’t happen thanks to Blake Griffin. Jeremy Lin comes to the Jazz just to make it all work out.

by 






















