Thesis/Antithesis: Hayward at 2 or 3
Thesis: Lots of yall have talked about Hayward being misused as a 3 when his more natural, fruitful effort is at 2.
Antithesis: Pre-game show on KFAN featured Tom Nissalke and Phil Johnson. (They weren't specifically talking about Hayward.) Phil said, "2 or 3 are interchangeable on offense," and that distinction matters more on defense. Nissalke agreed.
Synthesis: ......your thoughts, friends.
[I'm inclined to agree with the experts (with respect to all yall) insofar as the Jazz offense (especially) includes passing and screening and cutting for just about everybody. They've been running a lot of flex in the couple of hours'-worth I've watched so far this year. Flex doesn't care who you are...if you run it for the entire shot clock, everyone gets a turn on the block, everyone gets a turn at the elbow, everyone at the wing. So is Hayward really being limited by the label "3"?]
All comments are the opinion of the commenter and not necessarily that of SLC Dunk or SB Nation.
19 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Depending on who the other wing is
depends on who will be guarding him. If he’s playing with bell I feel like he is being limited by getting unfavorable matchups on defense AND by getting the taller player guarding him, therefore even though in the Jazz offense the sf and sg are interchangeable, he is basically playing sf by all standards.
Louisiana Jazz fan
Yep, that is exactly the problem.
If Hayward is guarding the SF on defense, it’s more likely the SF will guard him as well.
I am in no way affiliated with the blog of the same name.
Good comment Mtn
The insight from Coach Johnson on the pre and post game – as well as during broadcasts has been fantastic. He does not mince words and is very candid with his insights. Good stuff.
yojimbo is jazzed
2011-2012 is our 2012-2013 pre-season
I only caught a snippet
I’d like to hear more.
I'll make it coach.
by MTN on Jan 4, 2012 6:31 PM MST up reply actions
Hayward's role will be the same at SF or SG
No doubt.
To me the issue is who he’s matched up against. I think he is physically dominant over a 6’6" SG. Not so much against a 6’8" SF.
I got the crap beat out of me in Provo one time
6'8" SF who probably outweighs him by 10-15 lbs.
I am in no way affiliated with the blog of the same name.
I really really like him at sg
he seems to play better when he is at sg, those few times when he was with howard on the court he played stellarly.
Follow me on Twitter @tangibleyogurt
I am also really liking burk's passing ability
I wan to see gordon at the 2 and burks at the 1.
Follow me on Twitter @tangibleyogurt
I like how effortlessly he seems to pass it.
Charges in, then next thing you know a teammate has an open look. Been wanting to see a Burks/Hayward backcourt since the draft!
Utah>*
I think we'd all like to see how this would work out.
With Howard at the 3, Favors at the 4, Kanter at the 5, that’s a long, athletic lineup.
I am in no way affiliated with the blog of the same name.
Oh golly, I'd love to see that lineup get some significant minutes this year.
Then I’d be on the Josh Howard bandwagon all the way.
I got the crap beat out of me in Provo one time
The odds of seeing this lineup at any point this season has to be less than 1%.
I am in no way affiliated with the blog of the same name.
Have we seen this line up at all?
Less Burks at the point of course?
yojimbo is jazzed
2011-2012 is our 2012-2013 pre-season
by jazzed on Jan 10, 2012 11:36 AM MST via Android app up reply actions
BasketballValue.com says Watson, Hayward, Howard, Favors, and Kanter have played together for 2.65 minutes
If I’m reading the chart correctly.
I am in no way affiliated with the blog of the same name.

by 




















