FanPost

KOC talking to himself about Kirelenko

This is an imaginary conversation KOC had with himself about Kirelenko.

KOC #1: I have done a good job this summer. I have improved our perimeter defense, 3 point shooting, pick n’ roll defense, the wing position. I got something for nothing. I made our team better.

KOC #2: That’s fine but what have you done for me lately.

KOC #1: What do you mean? This isn't that thing about Kirelenko again is it? I brought in Marvin Williams doesn't that end the conversation?

KOC #2: I said please, pretty please, pretty please with sugar on top and nothing. I think he would bring a lot to this team: would complement our young core well, brings tough defense, can play multiple positions, passes well, plays well off the ball, is a vet that doesn’t demand a lot of minutes, and has develop a great 3 point shot.

KOC #1: But we are set at the wing. Last year we started with 5 wings, this year we probably have 6 (unless Murphy is just another Morris Almond and I can fleece somebody into taking Bell).

KOC #2: We can trade Bell. Plus isn’t Kirelenko a huge upgrade over at least 4 of those players. He would make our team better.

KOC #1: But across 2 positions there is only really room for three main guys’ right? 48 minutes times 2 positions divided by 3 players equals 32 minutes each. I already have my guys and I hate log jams. I am not willing to sacrifice Burks’ development anymore.

KOC #2: What if we play Burks as the backup point guard (picking up 10-20 minutes) and play Kirelenko at the Power forward position part time (picking up 10 – 15 minutes) that gives us 30-35 more minutes. Burks still gets his 32 minutes per game so does Kirelenko.

KOC #1: That’s fine but we already have a log jam at the 4/5 spot remember and you’re suggesting taking away more minutes from our crowd of 4/5s? That won’t work.

KOC #2: We’d have to trade Jefferson or Millsap to make it work.

KOC #1: are you crazy, they are both border-line All Stars and are our best players. Where will the points come from???

KOC #2: But Favors is the future, we traded an All-Star for him because we knew he would be an All-NBA. He will take their place. The only real debate is between Jefferson and Millsap.

KOC #1: How does that elevate our log jam at the wing? I am fuzzy on the math.

KOC #2: At the wing position we would have: Hayward, Williams, ½ Burks, ½ Kirelenko as our main wings. 1 + 1 + ½ + ½ = 3, no log jam. Carroll and Murphy can be injury insurance.

KOC #1: I get it, and at 4/5 spot we have Favors, ½ Kanter, ½ Kirelenko and either Jefferson or Millsap, also no log jam. What about the point guard spot? We just got rid of a log jam there and you want to bring it back.

KOC #2: This is the big sacrifice. We would have Mo Williams (our favorite) for 25 – 30 minutes, Burks for 10 – 15 minutes and two great backups that would be limited to 10 minutes total. We may have to consider a trade later on for one of them. Maybe when Chicago can’t find a temporary point guard or when somebody else looses their point guard they are going to over pay us for a temporary point guard.

KOC #1: What will happen if Kanter develops enough to need more than 20 minutes?

KOC #2: I can see 3 scenarios: 1 – one of Kanter, Burks, Hayward, Ma Williams, or Mo Williams doesn’t develop the way we thought and the minutes get adjust accordingly 2 – They are all awesome and we have to trade somebody but that’s a good thing right? 3 – Or we let a contract expire (Jefferson, Millsap, Mo Williams, etc…)

KOC #1: Won’t we be over the cap if we pay Kirelenko?

KOC #2: Yes but only by a little bit. We should be able to stay safe by dumping Bell and trading a big or point guard by the trade deadline.

KOC #1: What if that doesn’t happen?

KOC #2: We will have 4-5 expiring contracts at the deadline someone will bite.

KOC #1: What do we need to do to make this happen?

KOC #2: Put “the ball in Burks hands this summer,” see what he can do at the Point. Work your magic with 1 more trade Bell and a Big. Work out a deal with Kirelenko.

KOC #1: Won’t Kirelenko be expensive?

KOC #2: He really wants to play here. He respects our owners and our team and wants to be here. I hope he would give us a discount. We really should be able to afford about $7M per year. That is a little low for his expected range but is sounds like he will work with us.

KOC #1: So who are the losers in this deal?

KOC #2: The losers would be Carroll, Evans, Murphy, Watson and Tinsley. Poor Evans.


All comments are the opinion of the commenter and not necessarily that of SLC Dunk or SB Nation.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join SLC Dunk

You must be a member of SLC Dunk to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SLC Dunk. You should read them.

Join SLC Dunk

You must be a member of SLC Dunk to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SLC Dunk. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker