How many wins should we expect?

A couple weeks ago, used basketballreference’s 2013-14 winshares/48 minute projections to estimate the number of wins the Jazz will end up with this coming year. Even though the author of that article did his math wrong (he should have ended up with 36, rather than 28 wins), I thought it was an interesting idea (flawed, but interesting enough to play around with)– one with concrete elements (individual minutes & production) that we could use to guesstimate/argue about the number of wins the Jazz will have this year.

All you need to do is figure out how many minutes you think each player will play and estimate their WS48. If you give me these numbers, I’ll plug it into the formula and tell you how many wins the Jazz should end up with.

Basically, WS/48 works like this:

.200 = true superstar production

.150 = very solid, efficient production

.100 = average production

.050 = well below average production/efficiency

.000 = might as well be in the D-League

You can go into’s website and look at past and projected production for individual players, if you like. Or you can ignore those stats altogether and just give your personal estimate of a player’s 2013-14 production according to the WS48 framework. Just remember, that this is a per-minute type of metric. It doesn’t matter how many minutes a player plays, just how productive they are per minute.

For estimating minutes played, estimate number of minutes a player will have per total team games (82), not per games a player plays in. Thus if you think a player will be injured, or otherwise receive DNPs, you need to lower their averages. Most importantly, make sure the total team minutes add up to 240.

Here’s my estimates:

Hayward 31 minutes, 0.140 WS/48

Favors 30, .125

Kanter 27, .110

Burks 25, .065

Burke 20, .030

Rush 20, .090

Lucas 17, .045

Evans 14, .110

Williams 14, .080

Biedrins 13, .070

Jefferson 11, .065

Clark 8, .050

Gobert 6, .070

McNeal 4, .030

That computes to 36.0 wins (essentially the same number of wins as Yahoo article, even though I made somewhat different WS48 and minutes projections). Doesn't really add up to a tank.

Whose minutes or WS/48 do you think I’m off on? As I say, give me your own estimates, and I’ll compute how many wins they add up to.

For WS48 reference, last year’s leaders:

Lebron 0.322

Durant 0.291

T. Chandler 0.207

Parker 0.206

Harden .206

M. Gasol .197

From Northwest and Pacific divisions, here are players who last year were WS48:

Near .150: N. Collison, K. Martin, Sefolosha, Lawson, Gallinari, Millsap, A. Jefferson, Hickson, Kirilenko, D. Jordan, M. Barnes, C. Landry, D. Lee

Near .100: Liggins, Iguodala, C. Brewer, Mozgov, J. Hamilton, Kanter, Batum, M. Leonard, W. Matthews, W. Green, C. Butler, Bogut, Biedrins, P. Gasol, S. Blake, T. Evans, D. Cousins, Dragic, Dudley, Scola

Near .050: J. Lamb, D. Fisher, Burks, Babbitt, Barea, Duhon, Fredette, A. Brooks, F. Garcia, Mark. Morris, Telfair, S. Brown

All comments are the opinion of the commenter and not necessarily that of SLC Dunk or SB Nation.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SLC Dunk

You must be a member of SLC Dunk to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SLC Dunk. You should read them.

Join SLC Dunk

You must be a member of SLC Dunk to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SLC Dunk. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.